|
Home
>
8. Proposal Summary
>
8.3 Dependencies and Technical Risks
|
Previous
Next
|
|
|
|
|
Re-Engineering the Financial System to Interface
directly.
|
|
Pros
Engineers can create
capacity with re- engineering a new interface which will provide
opportunity for growth in the future.
Cons
Interface system was
not expected, and will require additional Technical Resources to
complete
|
|
Pros
Reduces future costs
impact by increasing capacity now, while allowing for future
growth.
Cons
The Interface system
will cost an additional 50% that Young- Young was not
anticipating.
|
|
Pros
From an operational
business perspective, the increased capacity will likely lead to
reduce operational overhead while maintaining a level of quality to
the customer.
Cons
Upfront, unexpected
costs will undoubtedly affect operational Free- Cash flow, and
ultimately could affect profitability for at least the quarter the
project is completed in.
|
|
Pros
Additional Resources
could be added that would allow the schedule to maintain current
course.
Cons
Unexpected projects
and unforeseen issues in developing the new system and testing its
interaction could delay the project overall
|
|
CTU Consulting, Inc will provide management weekly
updates on a conference call, the schedule to be determined between
the associated parties.
|
|
We focused primarily on orientation and general
requirement development and matrix definition.
|
|
We focused mainly on Cost measures to assure
feasibility.
|
|
We focused on Function Point Analysis and
determining the function points of the design for
Young-Young’s Customer Service System and integrated
Financial and Inventory Tracking Systems.
|
|
We focused on proposing the solution to
Young-Young’s current problem, ultimately culminating in this
Proposal document for engagement of services.
|
|
These future weeks will be entirely focused on
development of the proposed solution and implementing these
proposed solutions within the 6 month time
frame.
|
|
|
|
|